While reading Shelley’s A Defense of Poetry, I was struck
by similarities between the reasons he cites in this work and those he puts
forth in his arguments for European support of the Greeks in their War of Independence.
Elevating the legacy of poetry as the determinate of its importance, Shelley
states, “A poet is a nightingale who sits in darkness and sings to cheer its
own solitude with sweet sounds,” effectively minimizing the person of the poet
himself in relation to his output (1171). In his arguments for British
intervention in the Greeks’ struggle, he chooses to emphasize the cultural
value of Greece as the birthplace of art and literature rather than balk at the
physical violence of the conflict. Speaking of the lyrical Poets of Athens, he
proclaims “never at any other period has so much energy, beauty, and virtue
been developed,” and continues, “it is Poetry alone…which has rendered this
epoch memorable above all others” (1172). Because poetry has the capacity to
transcend time and individual memories, Shelley defends its compositional
practice and consumption, an idea I imagine he also applied to his reasoning
for siding with Greece to preserve the birthplace of this poetic tradition.
Delacroix's Greece Expiring on the Ruins of Missolonghi.
.jpg!Blog.jpg)
I agree with Katherine's comment that "poetry has the capacity to transcend time and individual memories". I believe part of Shelley's argument for poetry rests on poetry's ability to transcend circumstances and time. Shelley suggests that poetry is part of humanity's inner core. Therefore, the imagination and beauty of poetry can be applied to a host of different situations across time. Poetry, in this light, is one of the key connecting ideas of human kind.
ReplyDeleteThis is a very intriguing connection. But, I wonder what Shelley would say about contemporary, post-debt crisis Greece...
ReplyDelete