Ode to the Classics:
An Analysis of the ways in which Romanticism Derives from Greek and Roman
Classicism
In 1916, Percy Shelley declared to Lord
Byron that the French Revolution was, “ the master theme of the epoch in which
we live". Letters from France echoes
this sentiment, dictating many
early-Romantic writers’, including Burke, Paine, and Wollstonecraft, feelings
on the French Revolution. While the French Revolution was a major source of
inspiration for early Romantic writers, its roots can be better derived from
early Greek and Roman Classicism. In a way, one can view the Romanticism as a
recapitulation of Early Greek and Roman thought, inspired by the French
Revolution, similar to the way in which the Renaissance was a recapitulation of
the same ideas, inspired by multiple impetus, including the Black Death and the
corruption within the Catholic Church. History and Romanticism are intertwined,
with Romantic writers seeing themselves as prophets with the ability to sense “historical
depth in the inanimate world” (Underwood). This paper will explore and analyze
the ways in which ‘Romantic’ writers 1) glorify the Roman tradition through form
2) use Greek mythology through allusion to create meaning within their
writings.
In his essay “Of History and
Romance,” William Godwin wrote, on the subject of the Greeks and Romans, that
there was “something in their nature…that expanded and fired the soul”. He
continues, stating definitively that any man that cannot recognize the
brilliance of these “ancient giants” must be “destitute” of some of the “first
principles of discrimination.” Additionally, one who fails to appreciate the ancients
must possess an “unelevated” soul. For Romantic writers, the Greek and Roman
tradition possessed an untouchable power and influence; the ancients possessed
wisdom completely absent in the artists that followed due to their “free and
undaunted spirit”. History damaged the classical ideas of wisdom and freedom,
and by replicating the classical tradition, Romantic writers attempted to also
achieve a sense of that lost wisdom and freedom.
This link between antiquity and
Romanticism is evident even in the naming; the Oxford English Dictionary
defines ‘romance’ as being “descended from Latin” literally, but also in the
figurative sense. Romanticism is clearly descended from the Latin tradition; it
is language, as an art rather than a literal form of communication, transcended
from Roman origins. Additionally, it was Romantics who coined the term
Romanticism further demonstrating the deliberate attempt to recreate the
classical tradition.
The way in which Romanticism derives
from Roman tradition is clearly evident in the construction of the classical
‘Romantic’ ode. Many of the ‘Romantic’ odes are clearly derived from famed
Roman poet Horace’s traditional ode. The Horatian ode employs, “unified stanzas…with
the same metrical pattern” and also tended to employ subjects that were more
“personal,” “meditative,” and “restrained”. The Horatian model is apparent in
poems from both generations of Romantics, particularly in the odes of late
Romantic John Keats.
Keat’s “Ode on a Grecian Urn” clearly exemplifies the
Horation tradition in both form and content. His poem maintains ten line
stanzas with a nearly consistent rhyme scheme. His rhyme scheme, in the first
four lines, is consistently alternating couplets of ABAB, however, the last six
lines of his poem alternate between slightly differing rhyme schemes. The first
and last stanzas employ the same rhyme scheme of CEDDCE, while the second
employs a scheme of CDECED, and the third and fourth stanzas utilize a more
‘traditional’ CDECDE scheme. While Keats diverges from the traditional Horation
ode in his rhyme scheme, by starting and ending with the same metrical pattern
Keats, in way, indicates that the ‘proper’ scheme is the one that begins and
ends the poem. Perhaps Keats utilizes the same scheme in the first and last
stanzas understanding that, from a spectator’s point of a view, the first and
last stanzas are the most ‘critical’. Additionally, his modifications to the
traditional Horatian rhyme scheme demonstrate the way in which his knowledge of
Horatian form is obscured by time and death; it would be impossible, according
to Keats, to completely replicate the Horatian ode because Horace is dead.
Keats is merely recreating the form from the writings Horace left behind.
Additionally, content
wise, Keats’ ode is entirely Horatian, concerning itself with the most personal
subject of all: mortality. It is interesting that Keats uses the Roman ode
considering the subject of his poem; he parallels the idea of an artistic legacy,
“beauty is truth,” by using a poetic form created by one of the greatest Roman
poets. Keats, through the ode, evokes the Classical tradition to understand his
own mortality, as an artist. By evoking the classical tradition, Keats’ affirms
the mundane nature of his own mortality, arguing that, like all other men, he
will die, and his only immortal self is the one he, himself, immortalizes in
his art. Horace himself is noted for saying, “He has not lived badly whose
birth and death has been unnoticed by the world,” with Keats affirming this
when he writes that following his generation’s demise, “Thou shalt remain, in midst of other woe.” Here, Keats, exemplifies
Horace’s mundane idea of death, declaring that when all have died they will
return to the Earth and continue to exist, just in other mediums. In a way,
Keats is both deeply personal and deeply impersonal in this poem, struggling to
understand to his own mortality while lamenting the most archaic struggle,
defining one’s inexistence. While some have viewed Keats’ poem as generic and
passé, his fusion of the deeply personal with the impersonal makes his art
truly unique in the way it conveys meaning. He uses the traditional form and
content, but creates meaning in a truly ‘Romantic’ way.
The Roman tradition is continued in the
construction of the Romantic sonnet, as well. While the Petrarchan sonnet that
many Romantics employ only arose in the 15th century, in the works
of Italian poet Petrarch, their decision to use the Italian sonnet over the
traditional English Shakespearean sonnet indicates the connection to the Roman
tradition. The Italian language is, in its purest form, the spoken form of
Latin; therefore, the Italian sonnet is more inherently Roman, in its
linguistic roots, than Shakespeare’s sonnet. While Petrarch’s sonnets were
revolutionary for being written in Italian, Romantic poets see the Italian form
as the most classical because of the implications of it being written it
Italian. In a way, their exemplification of Petrarch’s form inherently rejects
their native British interpretation, in favor of the classical one. However, it
is obvious from the Romantic interpretation that writers attempted to, in a
way, Anglicize it, creating a British Petrarchan sonnet.
This fusion is apparent in early Romantic
William Wordsworth’s poem “I Griev’d for Buonaparte,” where Wordsworth fuses
the rhyme schemes of both the Petrarchan and Shakespearean sonnets. The first
four stanzas utilize the traditional Petrarchan scheme of ABBA. Contextually,
the first stanza is also in accordance with the Petrarchan tradition. The theme
of unrequired love, the prevalent in Petrarchan sonnets, presents itself as unappeasable
confusion, in a sense. Wordsworth’s confusion derives from his inability to
understand his own reaction to Carlo’s existence and the way in which he
grieves a man who suppressed freedom. His grief is not literal mourning, but a
feeling of burden. Wordsworth cannot comprehend the burden left behind by
Carlo’s actions. Due to his gambling addiction and prominent position in Louis
XVI’s court, Carlo contributed heavily to the French revolution through his
selfishness, apparent in Wordsworth’s choice to describe the burden left as “vain” and “unthinking” (Wordsworth, 1-2).
The second stanza completely diverges from the
first, exemplifying the ABAB rhyme scheme present in Shakespeare’s sonnet,
while also changing his subject from the selfish and vain Buonaparte to the
subject of kind and nurturing fathers. While his adjectives in the first
stanza, “vain,” “unthinking” are cacophonous and harsh sounding, his adjectives
in the second are far more pleasing (Wordsworth, 1-2). He describes the governor
as “wise and good” possessing a “sternness of the brain” (Wordsworth, 6-7). The
personal aspect of the English sonnet is obvious here, as Wordsworth is not
criticizing Carlo for his political actions, but for his role as a father and
the legacy with which he has burdened his children with. He argues that, while
many praise a mother’s love, it is a father’s kindness that dictates a child’s
future character. He also recognizes that “true Sway” is rooted not in wealth or
name, but in “wisdom,” also characterized as having “children round her knees,”
demonstrating not only power of the mind but the power of parenthood
(Wordsworth, 9/14). Wisdom is characterized as a mother because it is through
one’s parents that one learns to understand the world. The idea of wisdom and
reason as prevailing source of power is a traditionally classical idea,
considering the structure of Greek and early-Roman politics; in a democracy or
a Republic, one achieves power through their wisdom and ability to reason, not
through blood. Wordsworth, in this poem, is celebrating the Greek and Roman
tradition, in a way, accrediting its fall to men like Carlo.
While the Roman tradition is exemplified in
the Romantic form, the Greek tradition presents through mythology in the
Romantic construction of allusion. While it is obvious that Romantics embrace
the Roman heritage more than the Greek one, their mythology is more
predominantly used to create meaning within the text. While their myths are
obviously fantastical, they typically convey deeper meanings that extend to
humankind, providing a sense of wisdom. Romantic writers utilize Greek myths in
their writing to convey a similar sense of wisdom.
Writer William Blake, in paticular, was obsessed with Greek
mythology, considering it to contain the “substance of spiritual truth concerning
the nature and destiny of the human soul.” (Raine) His
devotion for mythology is apparent in his poems, “Little Girl Lost” and “Little
Girl Found,” where he compares the titular little girl to the Greek goddess
Persephone through use of her nickname, “Lyca.” Blake’s allusion to myth
is clear from his repetitive use of the name Lyca, also the most frequently
used word in the poem. He names the little girl frequently and explicitly to
make obvious the fact that his little girl is a version of Greece’s Persephone.
According to myth, Persephone, the Goddess of the Harvest,
was the most beautiful woman in the realm. Hades, desiring her beauty,
kidnapped her, forcing her parents, Zeus and Demeter, to furiously search for
her, refusing to give up until Hades released Persephone from hell. He
eventually released her from hell, giving her a pomegranate that, when eaten,
cursed Persephone to spend a third of the year in the Underworld with Hades.
Blake uses the myth of Persephone to both detail the journey
of the little girl, but also to formulate a relationship between loss of
innocence and death. In both “The Little Girl Found” and “The Little Girl
Lost,” Blake euphemizes sleep as death, which results from loss of innocence. The
little girl’s “heart does ache” when her mother is awake and weeping, yet if
the mother is ‘sleeping’, “Lyca shall not weep” (Blake, 25-28). Lyca watches,
in the first poem, “The Little Girl Lost” as her parents sleep, trying to sleep
alongside them. However, she has trouble sleeping as she is “lost in desert
wild”; yet, she is not literally lost, but lost in fantasies due to her
innocence. In “The Little Girl Found,” Lyca is discovered sleeping by her
parents, demonstrating her own loss of innocence. Additionally, even though the
poem is titled “The Little Girl Found,” this poem, from Songs of Experience, portrays her as being literally lost. She is
only ‘found’ because she has fallen from innocence. Additionally, there is a
sexual connotation to her lost innocence, apparent in Blake’s drawing through
the image of a man and woman embracing. Persephone lost her innocence because
one can assume Hades took her purity, so to speak and thus Blake’s lost girl
loses her own innocence with sexual intercourse and maturity.
Blake also uses this myth to reject
childlike innocence, arguing it inherently damns one to a hellish. When
Persephone thinks she has gotten out of hell the first time, she innocently
eats a Pomegranate that damns her there for one third of eternity. The Little
Girl similarly thinks that she has achieved happiness through sleep, but then
she dies and loses her identity completely. Her death is Blake’s literal way of
stating that happiness cannot exist without innocence, but that particular
happiness is not happiness but naivety masquerading as happiness. Innocence is
damaging because it is the naivety it produces that negatively determines one’s
fate: death.
The Romantics were clearly not
innovators, but rather deep thinkers with a profound appreciation for antiquity
that attempted to recreate the wisdom and knowledge the ancients possessed.
They were not revolutionary for their wisdom, but their presentation of ancient
ideas. The ancients were simply the best, and, thus, the primary goal was to
achieve brilliance relative to their brilliance. While the Romantic Era is
inherently an ode, in itself, to history, the movement does not represent
another period more clearly than that of antiquity.
Works Cited:
Romantic Historicism and the Afterlife
Ted
Underwood
PMLA , Vol. 117, No. 2 (Mar., 2002), pp.
237-251
Blake and Tradition by Kathleen Raine;
The Review of English Studies , New Series, Vol. 22, No. 85 (Feb.,
1971), pp.93-95
"Horatian ode." Encyclopædia Britannica.
Encyclopædia Britannica Online Academic Edition. Encyclopædia Britannica
Inc., 2012. Web. 28 Apr. 2012. <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/271664/Horatian-ode>.
"Persephone." Encyclopedia
Mythica. 2012. Encyclopedia Mythica Online.
18 Apr.
2012 <http://www.pantheon.org/articles/p/persephone.html>.
Beautiful post and I love the backround picture you have on your blog. Did you take it?
ReplyDeleteI don't know if you can buy kefir cream cheese. I made my own.