Monday, April 9, 2012

Wollstonecraft's Women

Though I'm sure a number of Wollstonecraft's deeply embedded arguments against the nature of women in society, and the influences of education, rationality, and politics, were lost on my initial reading of the text, I really enjoyed her consideration of antiquity as a foundation for common sentiments about women. She argues that Milton asserts that "women are formed for softness and sweet attractive grace", ultimately depriving them of character or souls. Later she discusses the influence of Moses's poetical story, and how often times men look to this biblical reference to prove that Eve, and therefore women, was borne straight from the rib of Adam (men). Furthermore, in chapter 2, Wollstonecraft considers a woman's predestined utility as an object cultivated to please men, as a catalyst for female infidelity. She argues that the allure of female charm will inevitably fade and they will be forced to look into oneself for a sense of comfort. Otherwise, they will be driven to please other men. This argument, of course, applies to those women who lack a sense of conviction or the knowledge/ability to self promote their moral, emotional, and rational selves.

1 comment:

  1. While your argument has analytical grounds, your use of the term "antiquity" is inaccurate and therefore deters from your analysis. The term "antiquity" applies, primarily, to the Greco-Roman civilizations, yet you lump together stories from the bible and writings by British poet Milton, and term that "antiquity". It would have been more interesting, perhaps, to analyze the objectivity in Milton's quote in the stories from the bible, seeing how that analysis relates back to the foundation of what you term "common sentiments about women". Also, perhaps you could look closer at Wollstonecraft's criticism of the common sentiments about women to see whether or not the conclusion you reached in the end is well supported throughout Wollstonecraft's text because I think you may have missed some of the more pressing points of her argument.

    ReplyDelete