Thursday, April 26, 2012

Family and Children

A theme that has recurred across the works and discussions of this semester is that of family and children. This theme has come to us in many forms: in novels and in poetry, in true familial or in metaphorical sense, in politics and in nature, in interactions between brothers and sisters, parents and children; there is something surrounding the Romantic Era which seems to thrive on the portrayal of these familial ties. Although writing about siblings and relatives appears in the work of the most significant Romantics, the topics of children, childhood, and the parent’s relationship with the child are heavily focused on in the works we have studied and how they have been interpreted on this blog. In fact, William Stroup, Professor of English at Keene State College, notes that “The most famous texts from Romantic writers emerge from the writer’s childhood memories or engage in ideas about children’s lives” (Stroup, 1). My final post will discuss how the child is first explored as a figure in the poetry and illustrations of William Blake, it will move into how the child is addressed in terms of growth and development the works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge and William Wordsworth, and then it will culminate with an exploration of the relationships between parents and children in Jane Austen and in Felicia Hemans.

The “cult of the child,” or the exploration of the child in poetry, flourished in England after William Blake began to embody this in his poetry, particularly in his volumes Songs of Innocence and Songs of Experience (Banerjee). Peter Coveney says that it was in Blake that we have, “the first coordinated utterance of the Romantic imaginative and spiritually sensitive child” (Coveney, 51). Katie in her post, “Infant Sorrow vs. Infant Joy,” remarks on how Blake conveys the idea of the spiritually sensitive child by putting the poems in the point of view of a newborn baby.  The child in “Infant Joy” is born unaware, unnamed and only feeling pure joy, while the child in “Infant Sorrow” is struggling, “helpless and naked” (3) and is fully aware of the danger that faces him as he has left the womb of the mother. This development of innocence leading into experience is what marks this set of poems, and the figure of the child, who is naturally going through their own development, is the perfect vessel for Blake to use as an allegory.  He also explores how the innocence of a can seem delightful, but naïveté can also lead to sorrow, pain, and loss as seen in the “The Little Girl Lost” and “The Little Girl Found” poems. In these poems, the kidnapping of a young and naïve girl changes her into an experienced and sexualized being.

Another way that Blake contributes to the Romantic theme of the family and children is through his artistic depictions that accompany his poems. These prints were analyzed in multiple posts on the blog primarily to discuss the changes in color across multiple editions and how they affected the interpretation of the poem. One can compare the differing depictions of “Infant Joy” and “Infant Sorrow” which further magnify their poetic differences. “Infant Joy” shows both mother and child safely cradled in a flower and watched over by a kind angel or fairy, while “Infant Sorrow” shows a child exposed and writhing in distress as the mother rushes towards it. These artistic images further emphasize the connotation of childhood in the poems of Blake in regards to development from innocence to experience.         

     
                                                 “Infant Joy”Copy V. 1821        
   
                                             “Infant Sorrow” Copy V. 1821

Another poet who looks at childhood in terms of development is Samuel Taylor Coleridge. His great Romantic work, “Frost at Midnight,” was a subject of significant discussion on the blog in regards to his musings about childhood and how childhood experience shapes one’s adult life. He thinks not only about his own childhood experiences in the city, but he looks forward to the experiences of his own son in the future, where he will have a profound connection to nature. The theme of innocence is connected to childhood once again in Coleridge. I was particularly interested in Gary Snyder’s post, which compares the openness of nature to the open and accepting quality of the innocent child’s mind. Therefore it is through the appreciation of nature that innocence and childhood can be regained for Coleridge, and he rejoices in that connection in the poem.

          The “tender gladness” (49) with which Coleridge speaks about his son in the poem also speaks to the changing idea of the child in society during the Romantic era. For centuries of literary history, treating a child with this level of emotional expression was certainly not the norm. The high infant mortality rates of the pre-Romantic period made it difficult for parents to become deeply attached to their children, as the majority of them would not live to see adulthood (Stroup, 2). The steadily improving rates from the late 18th to the early 19th century allowed for parents like Coleridge to become emotionally connected to their children, and allowed them to realistically muse about their future as Coleridge does in “Frost at Midnight.” As a result of this, and thanks depictions by poets like Blake and Coleridge, the culture during this time period became profoundly child-centered.  The image of the child became the embodiment of Romanticism, as it was thought to be close to nature, pure, and uncorrupted (Clarke, 8). This new way of looking at children also affected art, as portraits of children began to increasingly stress innocence, “cuteness,” and dependence. (More info found here: http://www.bampfa.berkeley.edu/projects/newchild/family.html). A contrast in the mother and child images of the Renaissance and that of a mother and child scene in the early 19th century can be seen below. One can see how tightly the mother holds the child in Benjamin West’s Romantic era portrait of his wife, and how the child clings to the mother in full dependence. This is compared with the child in Raphael’s portrait, where affection is shown, but the child seems less dependent and more like a small, aware adult rather than a naïve child.


                                             “La Madonna del Gran’Duca”  
                                                       Raphael, 1504-5

 
                             “Mrs Benjamin West and her son Raphael”
                                         Benjamin West, 1770.

William Wordsworth was deeply affected by the idea of the child in his personal life as well as in his poetry. Like Coleridge, Wordsworth was fascinated with the experiences of the child and how they affect the experiences of the adult. In “Tintern Abbey” he explores the Romantic notion of how the child is deeply connected to nature in its purity, building on his idea that youth functions as “nature’s priest” (Banerjee). In the poem he reminisces, “For nature then/(The coarser pleasures of my boyish days, /And their glad animal movements all gone by)/ To me was all in all” (73-75). This poem also highlights the benefits of growing older, and how the rest of one’s life builds on adult experiences. He learned to love nature as a child, but he learned to think deeply about it and really appreciate it as an adult. The poem also acts on passing this information down to someone younger than him, his sister Dorothy, who, although not an actual child, assumes the innocence of a metaphorical child in this poem. (Dorothy actually suffered from declining mental and physical health during most of her years in close companionship with Wordsworth, as seen here: http://www.poetryfoundation.org/bio/dorothy-wordsworth. Perhaps in this sense she did assume the dependence of the child).

Although she is also not a child in the sense of age and experience, Anne Eliot from Jane Austen’s novel Persuasion, is profoundly affected as daughter by the actions of her father Sir Walter. As Kat points out in her post, the “ridiculous parent” is a repeated motif in the works of Austen, and is often used to highlight the absurdities and flaws of society. Sir Walter is obsessed with family, not in the affectionate sense, but in regards to family status and the importance of a family’s personal history. In order to seal his place in society, Sir Walter lives frivolously and irresponsibly, driving his family into debt. Anne loses agency in this sense. She is moved from place to place and is told what to do, not of her own choosing, but because of her family: the fact that they are in debt, or because her family wants her to make a suitable match, or because her sister needs Anne to care for her, or her nephew needs to be cared for. Her status as a woman further compounds this idea that she is will be dependent on her family or the new family she enters into with marriage. In this way, Anne is defined by her family and as a metaphorical child for most of the novel, until she gains some sense of agency.

           The role of a childlike, dependent woman versus an independent, unconventional woman is also explored in the poetry of Felicia Hemans. The “Bride of the Greek Isle” struggles with the act of leaving her family and leaving her connections to childhood and youth behind in order to enter an adult life with a husband. The image of the girl even calls to mind West’s portrait of the child above: “She wept on her mother’s faithful breast,/ like a babe that sobs itself to rest” (33-4). Furthermore, in the “Wife of Asdrubal,” Hemans explores the agency of a woman while also exploring the role of the mother. The wife and mother breaks out of the private sphere in order to act in the courageous way her husband would not. She makes the decision to commit infanticide, to kill the children with the loving hands of a mother rather than see them brutalized by the mob or killed in the fire, saying, “E’en now my sons shall die—and thou, their sire,/ In bondage safe, shalt let them expire./Think’st now I love them not?” (57-9). This sacrificial act not only represents a breaking out of dependency by women, but it also depicts the bonds of  mother and child that were held so dear during the Romantic era.

           Through these five authors, one can trace how the theme of how families and children were represented in he Romantic period. The figure of the child occurs across a variety of works and comes to represent the basic ideas of the Romantic era such as innocence, connection with nature, rebirth and dependency. In some cases the child is used as a symbol for a perceived dependence on another, and it is the breaking of that childlike reliance which is celebrated. Connections with parents and siblings and the idea of how family shapes one’s life are also explored during this time. As readers we bring with us our own familial connections and we are able to deeply engage in the works of Blake, Coleridge, Wordsworth, Austen, and Hemans at this fundamental level. For this reason, it is clear to see why the theme of family and children was so often used in the works of the greatest Romantic writers across the span of the genre.


Works Cited

Banerjee, Jacqueline. "The Ideas of Childhood In Victorian Children's Fiction: The Child as Innocent." The Victorian Web (2007). Web. 22 Apr. 2012. <http://www.victorianweb.org/genre/childlit/childhood1.html>.
Clarke, John. "Histories of Childhood." Childhood Studies: An Introduction. By Dominic Wyse. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub., 2004. Web. 24 Apr. 2012. <http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/content/BPL_Images/Content_store/Sample_chapter/0631233962/wyse%2002Chap01.pdf>.
Stroup, William. "The Romantic Child." Literature Compass 1.1 (2005). Web. 22 Apr. 2012. <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2004.00078.x/pdf>.

No comments:

Post a Comment