I was struck by the complexity of Lord Byron’s “Ode to Napoleon Bonaparte”. Rather than simply condemning Napoleon,
Byron poem works through Napoleon’s rise and fall. Moreover, Byron seems to evaluate the psychology of Napoleon
as he asks difficult questions about what its like to be at the top of world
and then the very bottom. Byron
begins the ode by pointing out the contrast of Napoleon’s before and after:
'Tis
done---but yesterday a King!
And
armed with Kings to strive---
And
now thou art a nameless thing:
So
abject---yet alive!
Byron repeatedly
calls our attention back to the extremity of Napoleon’s fall; even paralleling
Napoleon to Lucifer. Further, Byron compares Napoleon to other historical
figures that experienced falls from power such as Milo, Sylla, Charles I, and
Prometheus. However as he compares
Napoleon to these men, Byron makes an interesting assertion. He suggests that Napoleon’s fall is so
extreme that surely no man who knew Napoleon’s fate would ever make the same
mistakes and experience such a fall.
To shame the world again---
But
who would soar the solar height,
To
set in such a starless night?
The most important aspect
of this ode, I believe, is Byron’s intent to discover what could have caused
Napoleon (or really any man) to sacrifice everything—in summary, he is asking
why Napoleon needed more power when he already had so much. Two of the last stanzas speak to this effect:
There was a day---there was an hour,
While earth was Gaul's---Gaul thine---
When that immeasurable power
Unsated to resign
Had been an act of purer fame
Than gathers round
Marengo's name
And gilded thy
decline,
Through the long
twilight of all time,
Despite some passing
clouds of crime.
But thou forsooth must be a King
And don the purple vest,
As if that foolish
robe could wring
Remembrance from thy
breast
Where is that faded
garment? where
The gewgaws thou
wert fond to wear,
The star, the string,
the crest?
Vain froward child
of Empire! say,
Are all thy playthings snatched away?
Here, Byron identifies one of man’s greatest flaws (and surely
Napoleon’s greatest)—the inability to be satisfied. Byron suggests that Napoleon’s need to be a “king” and where
the “purple vest” is the reason for his fall. To further his point, Byron asks “where is that faded
garment”. This question points out
how Napoleon’s choice to seek further power was his end and ultimately a
pointless endeavor because as a prisoner the “purple robe” does him no
good.
I think, also embedded in the excerpted selection, if the idea that Napoleon's attempt to "wring remembrance" is not just his desire to be king, but also to surpass those predecessors who have already accomplished what he has already done. Historically, Napoleon was not only king, but Emperor. This "immeasurable power" is "unsated," and Napoleon would become greater than Milo, Scylla, and the like.
ReplyDelete