I’m not sure that Castle
Rackrent would be nearly as funny without the interjections of “the
editor.” It is so interesting that Edgeworth has allowed the reader three
layers of total unreliability for these “tales of other times” to be truly
told. First, there is the unreliability in Thady’s voice, which we discussed in
class. Furthermore, Castle Rackrent is
a compilation of “histories” written by unreliable Thady. Historical writings
are, historically, very easy to manipulate, and the importance of understanding
the past relies then on what those writing the history are willing to divulge
(Stalin, anyone??). Finally, we have the editing of these histories by
prophetic Editor, whose footnotes and glossary are both a mockery of academic
writing and the furthering of Edgeworth’s political agenda. The fact that a
glossary that further explains the unintelligible “idiomatic phrases” is
included in a book for English readers in the voice of an Irishman is quite
hilarious and potent as a tool for acknowledging English racism or prejudice
towards the Irish in the early 19th century. I think Edgeworth’s
modes of narrative are incredibly innovative. Through her unreliable narrator, “historical”
form and the Editor’s interruptions, Castle
Rackrent is able to satirize a variety of issues including how the English
view the Irish--the colloquial speak of this “colony” need be translated for
even the most uneducated of English readers.
No comments:
Post a Comment